Documenting Discipline
| Communicate clearly |
Documentation of discipline is not an exercise in tact and diplomacy. Communicating gaps between expectations and actual performance should be
- direct
- factual
- focused on behavior or performance rather than on the person
|
| Be specific |
General statements, such as "The employee is always late" are difficult to substantiate.
A record of the dates the employee was late and the times the employee arrived is much more useful in documenting the extent of the problem and why correction is required. |
| State the facts |
"Edna has a bad attitude" is a conclusion.
The facts are
- On April 3, Edna told her supervisor that she "would not" follow a directive to train a new employee on the scheduling system.
- On the morning of May 5, the supervisor overheard a phone conversation in which Edna told a client that she "didn't care whether [client] ever came back to this office for service."
"James appeared intoxicated" is a conclusion.
The facts are
- James staggered as he walked.
- James' speech was slurred and difficult to understand.
- There was a strong odor of alcohol.
|
| Avoid errors and mistakes |
Avoid these common errors in discipline documentation:
- mispelled words, incorrect grammar and punctuation
- incorrect dates and times
- inaccurate, incomplete descriptions of misconduct or poor performance
- wrong names
- wrong rule or policy cites
|
Resources:
OU Employee Relations, 405-325-5594, NEL 250
OUHSC Employee Relations, 405-271-2191, SCB 105
OU Tulsa Employee Relations, 918-660-3193, SAC 1C100